Hi Junxiao,

On 2017/12/27 15:35, Junxiao Bi wrote:
> Hi Changwei,
> 
> On 12/26/2017 05:20 PM, Changwei Ge wrote:
>> Hi Alex
>>
>> On 2017/12/26 16:20, alex chen wrote:
>>> Hi Changwei,
>>>
>>> On 2017/12/26 15:03, Changwei Ge wrote:
>>>> The intention of this patch is to provide an option to ocfs2 users whether
>>>> to allocate disk space while doing dio write.
>>>>
>>>> Whether to make ocfs2 fall back to buffer io is up to ocfs2 users through
>>>> toggling append-dio feature. It rather makes ocfs2 configurable and
>>>> flexible.
>>>>
>>> It is too strange to make ocfs2 fall back to buffer io by toggling 
>>> append-dio feature.
>>
>> It might be.
>> But as my changelog said, I think, append-dio is key to whether to allocate
>> space with dio writing. So filling hole and appending file should have the 
>> same reflection.
>>
>> Besides, in the early days, ocfs2 truly falls back to buffer io when 
>> append-dio is disabled and file hole is encountered.
> I think we have discussed a lot in your v1 version. This wasn't fit for
> mainline, you can keep one off-mainline patch.

Fine. I agree now.
I give up trying to push this patch into mainline.
BTW, could you please help review my another patch (ocfs2: try to reuse extent 
block in dealloc without meta_alloc) which is used to fix a dio crash issue?
So without this patch, dio still won't hit such an issue.
Your comments are very important to me.

Thanks,
Changwei

> 
> Thanks,
> Junxiao.
>



_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

Reply via email to