Hi Alex, On 2017/12/28 14:22, alex chen wrote: > Hi Changwei, > >> @@ -1347,8 +1362,15 @@ static int ocfs2_shift_tree_depth(handle_t *handle, >> struct ocfs2_extent_list *root_el;
>> @@ -1762,8 +1764,8 @@ int ocfs2_write_begin_nolock(struct address_space >> *mapping, >> */ >> ocfs2_init_dinode_extent_tree(&et, INODE_CACHE(inode), >> wc->w_di_bh); >> - ret = ocfs2_lock_allocators(inode, &et, >> - clusters_to_alloc, extents_to_split, >> + ret = ocfs2_lock_allocators(inode, &et, clusters_to_alloc, >> + 2*extents_to_split, >> &data_ac, &meta_ac); > We has doubled extent number in ocfs2_populate_write_desc(), so here we don't > need to double again. I think your comment here makes sense. I will remove the multiplier 2 in my next version of this patch. Thanks, Changwei > > Thanks, > Alex > _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
