On 18/3/29 10:06, Changwei Ge wrote:
> ocfs2_read_blocks() is used to read several blocks from disk.
> Currently, the input argument *bhs* can be NULL or NOT. It depends on
> the caller's behavior. If the function fails in reading blocks from
> disk, the corresponding bh will be assigned to NULL and put.
> 
> Obviously, above process for non-NULL input bh is not appropriate.
> Because the caller doesn't even know its bhs are put and re-assigned.
> 
> If buffer head is managed by caller, ocfs2_read_blocks should not
> evaluate it to NULL. It will cause caller accessing illegal memory,
> thus crash.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.chang...@h3c.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
> index d9ebe11..17329b6 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
> @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ int ocfs2_read_blocks(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci, u64 
> block, int nr,
>       int i, ignore_cache = 0;
>       struct buffer_head *bh;
>       struct super_block *sb = ocfs2_metadata_cache_get_super(ci);
> +     int new_bh = 0;
>  
>       trace_ocfs2_read_blocks_begin(ci, (unsigned long long)block, nr, flags);
>  
> @@ -213,6 +214,18 @@ int ocfs2_read_blocks(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci, u64 
> block, int nr,
>               goto bail;
>       }
>  
> +     /* Use below trick to check if all bhs are NULL or assigned.
> +      * Basically, we hope all bhs are consistent so that we can
> +      * handle exception easily.
> +      */
> +     new_bh = (bhs[0] == NULL);
> +     for (i = 1 ; i < nr ; i++) {
> +             if ((new_bh && bhs[i]) || (!new_bh && !bhs[i])) {
> +                     WARN(1, "Not all bhs are consistent\n");
> +                     break;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
>       ocfs2_metadata_cache_io_lock(ci);
>       for (i = 0 ; i < nr ; i++) {
>               if (bhs[i] == NULL) {
> @@ -324,8 +337,10 @@ int ocfs2_read_blocks(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci, u64 
> block, int nr,
>               if (!(flags & OCFS2_BH_READAHEAD)) {
>                       if (status) {
>                               /* Clear the rest of the buffers on error */
> -                             put_bh(bh);
> -                             bhs[i] = NULL;
> +                             if (new_bh) {
> +                                     put_bh(bh);
> +                                     bhs[i] = NULL;
> +                             }

Since we assume caller has to pass either all NULL or all non-NULL,
here we will only put bh internal allocated. Am I missing something?

Thanks,
Joseph

>                               continue;
>                       }
>                       /* We know this can't have changed as we hold the
> @@ -342,8 +357,10 @@ int ocfs2_read_blocks(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci, u64 
> block, int nr,
>                                * for this bh as it's not marked locally
>                                * uptodate. */
>                               status = -EIO;
> -                             put_bh(bh);
> -                             bhs[i] = NULL;
> +                             if (new_bh) {
> +                                     put_bh(bh);
> +                                     bhs[i] = NULL;
> +                             }
>                               continue;
>                       }
>  
> @@ -355,8 +372,10 @@ int ocfs2_read_blocks(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci, u64 
> block, int nr,
>                               clear_buffer_needs_validate(bh);
>                               status = validate(sb, bh);
>                               if (status) {
> -                                     put_bh(bh);
> -                                     bhs[i] = NULL;
> +                                     if (new_bh) {
> +                                             put_bh(bh);
> +                                             bhs[i] = NULL;
> +                                     }
>                                       continue;
>                               }
>                       }
> 

_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

Reply via email to