> -----Original Message----- > From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 9:27 AM > To: Ulf Zimmermann > Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com > Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Problem with tunefs.ocfs2, similar to fsck.ocfs2 on > EL5 > > On 09/27/2011 09:12 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote: > > - -----Original Message----- > >> From: Sunil Mushran [mailto:sunil.mush...@oracle.com] > >> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 10:09 AM > >> To: Ulf Zimmermann > >> Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com > >> Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] Problem with tunefs.ocfs2, similar to fsck.ocfs2 > on > >> EL5 > >> > >> I'll look at the tunefs issue. But the other one does not make sense. > >> strict_jbd is a compat flag. Mount should work. What is the mount > >> error? As in, in dmesg. > > I don't see any dmesg or /var/log/messages, but the error I saw was from > tunefs: > > > > demodb01 root /home/ulf # /usr/bin/yes | /sbin/tunefs.ocfs2 -U -L > /export/u07 /dev/mapper/u07 > > tunefs.ocfs2 1.2.7 > > tunefs.ocfs2: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) while opening device > /dev/mapper/u07 > > > > So that is correct. In short that flag was added to allow us to use the > jbd(2) features. We use this to create volumes > 16TB. > > I guess if you want to use with 1.2, format it with 1.2 tools.
That is what I ended up with. And I also made a point to certain people in the company about not stopping in the middle of upgrading database servers. _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users