John W. Eaton wrote: > On 4-Jun-2010, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > > | John W. Eaton wrote: > | > On 3-Jun-2010, Jake wrote: > | > > | > | 1. Is there a reason why these functions haven't already been > implemented? > | > | Lack of information on the algorithms, perhaps? > | > > | > Or, given that we have other ODE/DAE solvers that are quite good, no > | > compelling reason other than compatibility to write them? > | > | Some are good. I recall about a year ago doing an ODE project and found > that ode23 didn't converge so accurately. Perhaps the ODE I was trying to > solve was in the stiff category. But, ode45 was OK; and odebda was excellent. > > I was referring to lsode and dassl/daspk.
Ah. I'll have to check them out. Dan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
