Like the plan too. I'd be happy to be on the ppmc as well but am not sure whether I have enough karma for that. Is i only opened to Incubator PMC members for the moment?
On 2/18/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for this plan (which removes my earlier -1 .. hmm or does that make > it a +0/-0 state? ;-)). > > I'll be happy to be on the PPMC. > > Sanjiva. > > IOn Fri, 2006-02-17 at 23:22 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > +1 from me Noel. I will start a VOTE for the initial bunch of > > committers. Current PPMC consists for just the 3 mentors. (James, Geir > > and me). > > > > Current Incubator PMC members, please step up and volunteer for the PPMC > > work. > > > > thanks, > > dims > > > > On 2/17/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > > > > > > One thing that should be resolved as soon as possible is how we will > > > > bring in new members. At the moment there are 17 proposed new > > > > committers for a total of 37 committers. > > > > > > > it seems excessive. > > > > > > I agree, but we're also trying to have a relatively low barrier to help > > > build community. > > > > > > We have generally agreed that existing ASF Committers who want to > > > participate should sign up as the project is starting, and should be > > > accepted. But as a general rule, the PPMC should be voting on > > > committers. Again with an eye for community building. We can always > > > drop people. And, as a reminder, Committers do not have binding votes. > > > > > > The initial PPMC are the Mentors (actually the whole of the Incubator > > > PMC). I would suggest that the PPMC immediately act to add Bill Flood > > > and Ismael to the PPMC, at a minimum. Then the PPMC can address the > > > Committer list collectively. > > > > > > --- Noel > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > >
