On 8/9/06, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My expectation as a developer, is that whenever I deploy a new version of
the same process, the old version is retired so the new version is
activated. And if I intend to deploy two processes side by side, I should
pick different names to distinguish them.
Anything else would surprise me.
What about a rolling deployment scenario? This might take place in a
production situation where P.v1 needs to remain active to service
client requests that are already open and running but P.v2 needs to be
used to service any new requests? I'm not sure that covering this case
using unique names is exactly the solution.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
Castor - http://castor.org/
