Lance, The "name" attribute on the <process> element is the PID. There is currently an optional <type> element under the process element that does the decoupling. If the <type> element is present it is used to specify the BPEL definition's QName. If it is omitted then the definition's QName is assumed to be the same as the name/PID.
-Maciej On 8/25/06, Lance Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maciej, I would like to get a bit of clarification from you. I have been looking at the current implantation ( again, just to get an understanding of where we are vs where we are going ) and as I currently see it the deployment descriptor contains the PID in the form of the name attribute on the <process> element - is this correct? If so, moving forward are you suggesting that another element/attribute might be added to the deployment descriptor that decouples the process name from its PID? Lance
