Folks, I just ran into this yesterday...
http://tinyurl.com/nqjzh http://www.thearchitect.co.uk/weblog/archives/2006/09/000444.html Not sure what to make of it. -- dims On 9/15/06, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I believe the Dec-22-2005 draft qualification is about right. extensionActivity and extensibleAssign are both placeholders for extensibility element and thus have little semantic of their own. The BPEL compiler should be able to parser those and store them in the internal runtime object model for later processing (much like any extension element). However, as of today, Ode does not implement any BPEL extensions so placing anything in those elements would not effect much. You would need to extend the BPEL runtime to implement the behavior of your specific extensions. What extensions are you considering? alex Tammo van Lessen wrote: > Hi, > > could someone tell me something about the implementation status of > BPEL 2.0? To which draft version do you refer? The Ode homepage says > something about the committee draft Dec-22-2005, but it seems to me > that things like extensionActivity and extensibleAssign are not yet > implemented. Is it planned to support them? Is there somwhere a > priority list for such BPEL issues? > > Best, > Tammo >
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers)
