Hi Uday,

For one - ActiveBPEL is GPL. ODE will be under:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ODExSITE/Licensing

(ODE Team - is the above link still valid?)

From my experience, while ActiveBPEL is a perfectly usable engine - you
generally end up wanting to buy a commercial version as this gives you the
following:

http://www.active-endpoints.com/products/activebpelent/activebpel_tomcat/index.html

I can't see anybody deploying a BPEL process without process persistence
capabilities. So essentially - if you want to "really" use it - you have to
go commercial.

It is ODE's intent to provide capabilities such as process persistence with
no strings attached.

Back in the day, John Newton, ex-Documentum and currently Alfresco ECM
founder had the same impression - while the ActiveBPEL engine itself was
attractive, the constricted license structure prevented it from being
included/integrated into their ECM suite.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,

Zubin.

On 9/23/06, Uday Subbarayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi All:
I just came across Ode and wondering why do we need another open source
BPEL engine as we already have ActiveBPEL?

I am sure there will be lot's of reasons(tech & business) behind it and
just want to understand it...

Thanks,
-Uday.

I don't blog but e-write here:
http://uds-web.blogspot.com



---------------------------------
Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com.  Check it out.

Reply via email to