You mean an initiating <receive> and a subsequent <pick> without a
correlation would be considered a static error?
Maciej Szefler wrote:
I think this actually qualifies as a syntax error from a standard BPEL
2.0pointof view.
-mbs
On 10/3/06, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's not clear to me if you expect the unit test to succeed or fail.
In my view, the test is valid but may have two different outcomes
depending on whether you use implicit correlation (e.g. some form of
WS-Addressing).
If the initial <receive> stores correlation information into the
partnerLink and the <pick> uses the same partnerLink, then the test may
succeed.
If the initial <receive> does not initialize any correlation in the
partnerLink, then I think the following <pick> should fail if it doesn't
have an explicit correlation set.
alex
Lance Waterman wrote:
> All,
>
> I have created a BPEL unit test - "TestStaticPick". It contains an
> instantiating <receive> and then a subsequent <pick>. It appears to me
> that
> because the <pick> does not contain a correlation key the ODE router
> can not
> route the subsequent message. Before I open a JIRA issue I wanted to
> validate that the test makes sense from a BPEL standpoint ( note - the
> process compiles and executes okay ).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lance
>
