Actually most Ode committers (including myself) are in California. Also we're going to be a bit busy early next week. So would 4pm BST (8am PST) on Thursday work for you?
On 10/27/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure ok I guess an IRC chat would be fine to get started. I'm in UK time zone but can be pretty flexible about scheduling it. How about 9:30am BST next Tuesday? ..ant On 10/26/06, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > So what about an IRC session to get started? Everybody interested could > come to ask questions and we would discuss in more details how this could be > done. We can both exchange our views on SCA / BPEL and give as much > information as possible to the volunteers (like Sam [1]). > > What do you think? > > Matthieu > > [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200610.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On 10/25/06, ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/25/06, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This e-mail is being sent to both Apache Ode and Tuscany development > > > mailing > > > lists. > > > > > > The objective is to see which possible collaboration could happen > > > between > > > our 2 projects and how we could integrate them. Alex, Cory and > > > myself (we're > > > all Ode contributors) met with Jean-Sebastien Delfino and Simon Laws > > > (Tuscany contributors) during the ApacheCon in Austin and we've > > > found out > > > that integrating Ode into Tuscany could be a brilliant idea. > > > > > > From the Tuscany side, there's an SCA client and implementation spec > > > for > > > BPEL. Roughly, it defines how a BPEL process can be used as an SCA > > > component > > > (or at least that's my understanding of it). So I guess Ode could be > > > a good > > > choice for the BPEL part of that. > > > > > > From the Apache Ode perspective, we've defined an interface to the > > > engine ( > > > a.k.a. the integration API or IAPI for acromyn lovers) and we would > > > like to > > > support several integration scenarii. Currently we have an > > > integration layer > > > for Axis2 to support all web services interactions, we also have one > > > for JBI > > > and another one for CXF has been proposed. We would love to have an > > > implementation of these interfaces for Tuscany to be able to run Ode > > > in an > > > SCA environment (for the curious, the interfaces are > > > here<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ode/trunk/bpel-api/src/main/java/org/apache/ode/bpel/iapi/ > > > > > > > ). > > > > > > I think the discussion (if discussion there is) should take place on > > > tuscany-dev as there's less of us, Ode people, so it's easier for us > > > to > > > subscribe to it. > > > > > > So what would it take to fit into Tuscany? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Matthieu > > > > > > > > Hi Matthieu, this would be really great, i'd love for Tuscany to get a > > involved with Ode to get a BPEL component. > > > > For those that haven't found these already there's a white paper on > > SCA and BPEL [1] and a specification [2]. > > > > You can see the type of thing required to implement a container for a > > new component type in Tuscany by looking at some of our existing ones [3] > > > > I agree it may be easiest for the discussions to be over here > > initially, but i've subscribed to ode-dev as well anyway. I'd be very happy > > to help you do this, how would you like to get started? > > > > ...ant > > > > [1] http://osoa.org/display/Main/SCA+BPEL+White+Paper > > [2] http://osoa.org/download/attachments/35/SCA_ClientAndImplementationModelforBPEL_v0.95.pdf?version=2 > > > > [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/services/containers/ > > > > > >
