Bah, interceptors aren't called on responses so it wasn't such a good location for my tweaks after all.. I'll customize the other side, but imho it would still be a good idea to implement the interceptor-mechanism. And perhaps add a onPartnerResponse-method or something?
On 3/31/07, Janne Savukoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, I'd need to hack around some servicemix features and an interceptor would be great for the job. -janne > From: "Maciej Szefler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Looks like it got cut out in some refactor. Are you looking to use the > feature? > > -mbs > > On 3/29/07, Janne Savukoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Are the MessageExchangeInterceptors being used? The ones that are > > defined in deploy.xml. At least I couldn't find any references to > > method ProcessConfImpl#getMexInterceptors(...). I also checked the bug > > tracking and couldn't find any related issues. > > > > > > -janne
