+0 I must admit I have not tried buildr yet, but I trust you guys if you say it works :-) ... and I don't think maintaining 2 build systems is a good idea.
On 5/4/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys, I'm going to build a new release candidate for ODE, fixing the few problems here and there that were still pending on RC1. I've switched to our rake / buildr based build for the release simply because Maven2 is so unmanageable. So all our releases are built with buildr (which does the job quite well). I'm thinking that we should actually use buildr as our default build system for ODE. We'll have to support our releases for some time (I'm thinking of the source release here) and I'm very uncomfortable doing so with Maven2. It just breaks too easily. Any objection? Somebody who's such a Maven2 lover that he's willing to maintain the Maven2 build? Cheers, Matthieu
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Principal Engineer, IONA Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
