On 6/6/07, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

It's persistence processes where we should find strategies to improve
> > performance/scalability by reducing serialization cost.
>
>
> Yep, the flyweight pattern <http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?FlyweightPattern>
would
> be most efficient here (also suggested by Matthieu in different words)

That only works if you have a finite number of states.



Don't we have a finite number of persistent states for a given process
definition, without taking into account variables+partnerlinks?

alex

Reply via email to