+1 for human participation (BPEL4PEOPLE) I'd be interested in helping on this area...
On 6/19/07, Zubin Wadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 on the human participation piece. Absolutely critical. On 6/19/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Alex Boisvert wrote: > > > We're open to bringing Tempo under the Apache umbrella if there's > > > sufficient interest. It would be a good step towards building a > > > more complete BPM solution at Apache. > > > > Personally, I consider support for human participation in workflows to > be > > vital, so I'd be in favor of accepting a contribution to further that > > goal. > > > I think there's still several pieces missing to get a solid set of BPM > bricks in the ASF. ODE is just the first part but I'd personally like to > see > the following pieces implemented and made to work together: > > - a web service orchestration engine (ODE) > - human participation (could be Tempo) > - small footprint, embeddable process execution environment, > addressing the "programming in the small" set of problems (ala jbpm) > > There's much more than that to BPM but that's a lot of work already and we > can't dilute ourselves too much. However I think that's what we should > push > for. > > Matthieu >
-- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
