I forgot to tell that to raise this issue i have to clear the persistencer cache, otherwise everything seem's to be ok.
2006/3/7, Jean-Yves Sironneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello, > > I looked more precisely at my issue regarding foreign keys not being set, > so now i'am using official OJB 1.0.4. > > The exact issue is that when i persist a new object (that has not been > persisted before), the linked object is persisted and the foreign key is > set. But when i retrieve an object, then sets the linked object and then > persists the main object this time the linked object is not persisted and > the foreign key not set. > > I'am using the following code, to do the persistence, so the linked object > is set before that code : > > Implementation impl = OJB.getInstance(); > TransactionExt tx = (TransactionExt) > impl.newTransaction(); > > tx.begin(); > tx.markDirty(product); > tx.commit(); > > Can that be the reason ? Is the way OJB is navigating the object graph > different for an > initial store or an update ? > > > If you want i can try to package up a simple test case from that. > > > Thank you for your help. > > Jean-Yves > > 2006/2/20, Jean-Yves Sironneau < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hello, I have a few unrelated questions regarding OJB : > > > > - Is there a way to set the deferrable foreign key constraint setting > > using OJB xdoclet module ? > > > > - When i use anonymous foreign key in a relationship, it's working > > perfectly for collections, but > > for simple reference to an object, i have to store the referenced object > > and then store the object referencing > > it, otherwise the two objects are created in db but the foreign key id > > is not set. > > > > It's pretty hard to discover it because, when i retrieve the objects > > they are ok even if the db foreign key is not set. It's > > just later, if i restart my application for example, that the referenced > > objects fields are null. > > > > So i have two questions : Do you think it's normal behaviour ? And how > > can i force OJB to retrieve everything > > from database to be able to test this kind of possible issues ? > > > > By the way i'am using CVS version of OJB 1.1 approximately 2-3 months > > ago and the ODMG API > > (which is really working fine except for that). > > > > - Is the code for OJB 1.1 located in the 1.0 SVN branch ? Because i > > don't know if i better use > > OJB 1.0.4 (or future 1.0.5) or the version i got from CVS. > > > > > > Thanks your for your help. > > > > Jean-Yves > > > > >
