On 02-Jul-2015, at 5:53 pm, Karen Coyle <kco...@kcoyle.net> wrote: > > > On 7/2/15 4:35 AM, Charles Horn wrote: >> I'm worried now that getting updates released might be a much harder >> goal that getting code merged if there aren't any IA devs to oversee the >> release process, or support if something should go wrong. Merging code >> on github is one thing, getting it released sounds like it could be >> close to impossible if there isn't a currently functioning pipeline. >> There's a `production` branch in github that is very far behind the >> current master (last update 2011!), I'm not sure exactly what code is in >> production as of now, but I thought it had been updated since 2011? > > One of the barriers that I'm aware of is that Anand had the only test version > of OL, and possibly the only test suite. I haven't looked at the github repo, > but if there isn't a test suite, moving anything into production is pretty > risky. > > that said, I have no idea what the IA culture is for testing.
(facepalm) Sadly, we don’t have very good test coverage. What we have is a vagrant based dev setup, which mimics the production env. It is possible to test it manually before submitting a pull request. Anand _______________________________________________ Ol-discuss mailing list - Ol-discuss@archive.org http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-discuss Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/ol-discuss@archive.org/ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to ol-discuss-unsubscr...@archive.org
