> On May 3, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Ergi Thanasko <ergi.thana...@avsquad.com> wrote: > > Hi Dan, > Yes is it a zfs pool shared over NFS. Yup going through the rabbit whole, but > I can wait for a while I have patience. Any help is appreciated thank you
The most direct approach is to use multiple IP addresses: one per pool. Then you have a destination address for the flowadm tuple. — richard > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 3, 2016, at 7:10 PM, Dan McDonald <dan...@omniti.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On May 3, 2016, at 7:54 PM, Ergi Thanasko <ergi.thana...@avsquad.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> Is there any tools like flowadm that can control bandwidth usage on a per >>> pool basis? instead of host ip. Also flowadm will use both in/out summary >>> to limit bandwidth. We are looking for something deeper that we can >>> seperate control on incoming or outgoing or traffic at a pool level . >> >> flowadm only controls network abstractions. When you say "pool", do you >> mean zfs pool? If so, does that mean with NFS, or iSCSI, or SMB, or some >> other file-sharer TBD?!? You're going down a rabbit hole you can't get back >> out of quickly. >> >> Sorry, >> Dan >> > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss -- richard.ell...@richardelling.com +1-760-896-4422
_______________________________________________ OmniOS-discuss mailing list OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss
