2009/4/2 Jeff Godin <j...@tcnet.org>: > On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Dan Scott wrote: > >> The patch looks good to me, Jeff. There were a number of other places >> in the code where I have had to make similar changes to protect >> against XMLENT's meddlesome ways (/me shakes fist at XMLENT, while >> simultaneously being thankful for its existence). > > A number of other places, like the closed dates editor. :) > (thanks for your help with that one the other night!)
Yeah. If you grep all the files under /xul/ for CDATA, you'll see a ton there, too; mostly as a result of being broken by turning on XMLENT in earlier days. >> >> My apologies for introducing the regression via the eg_vhost.conf >> change in the first place. >> >> I'll reproduce and commit if it looks good. Thanks a ton for tracking >> this down, Jeff. > > You're welcome, and don't worry about it! I wasn't trying to point blame > by citing a changeset ("dbs broke it!") -- I was just trying to give > enough context to explain the reason for the patch. :) Oh, don't worry I understand and appreciate the intent. Context is good! > Thanks again for all your help. I really appreciate it. Aw, shucks :) Anyway, your patch tested out successfully and has been applied, with thanks. Keep 'em coming! -- Dan Scott Laurentian University