On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:31:56AM -0500, Tim Spindler wrote: > Thanks Jason, I appreciate your comments. I remember the statement about > the March release but since there hasn't been much talk about the timetable > and there was still talk about an Alpha 2 release before beta. I'm > wondering if a March release date is feasible?
We haven't talked about releases much recently, but we haven't been talking much about anything recently. (See also Ben Shum's question about dev meetings.) Assuming we maintain high standards of entry for commits to master, we should be able to cut a 2.2 release at pretty much any point in time. Cutting a second alpha within the next week and a beta a few weeks after that leaves some time for a release candidate or two to catch any glaring problems before a March release. Oh yeah, and for release notes and documentation and translations to get caught up too. In the absence of broadly automated testing, it would be wise to have manual tests for common scenarios so the community can avoid the kind of problems Conifer has been experiencing in 2.1. We upgraded to 2.1 over the holiday break and I've been putting in a lot of time subsequently dealing with upgrade issues [1] that would not be apparent with data that has been loaded into a fresh database. Hopefully a lesson learned? 1. Issues such as https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/920134 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/918020