On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:41:43PM -0500, Lebbeous Fogle-Weekley wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich < > alexey.la...@mnsu.edu> wrote: > > > Hello, developers. > > > > I am running the 2.1-2.2-upgrade-db.sql script from the 2.3.2 release > > tarball. > > > > [...] > > How important is it for the Authority Record ID to be 28 specifically? > > > > Can I safely change the script to make the ID be 31 to get past this > > problem? Or do I need a different solution? > > > > > Hi Alexey. Yes, you can change that to 31 for both appearances of 28 in > the line of SQL you cite. There should be no problem doing so.
This is arguably a bug similar to others where we've left space in the sequence values for stock system values, so I've opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1097399 accordingly - maybe it will help new libraries launching Evergreen avoid this upgrade issue in the future.