On 4/13/2010 5:08 PM, Steve Simmons wrote:
> 
> On Apr 13, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Todd Lewis wrote:
> 
>> Clearly the multi-line form is easier for humans to read, and the
>> related-data-on-one-line form is far simpler for scripts to parse. By far.
>> In both cases.
>>
>> Is there a place on the ballot to vote for... both, with a switch?
> 
> I'm a long-time fan of having a switch that causes tools to dump their data 
> in an easy-to-machine-parse format. That isn't always doable, but when it is, 
> it's a big win.

As Andrew pointed out in another reply in this thread, the -format
switch is support to provide that but it fails to provide a consistent
(value - data) pair per line.

Currently that output looks like:

name            root.cell
id              536870915
serv            204.29.154.37   bethlehem.your-file-system.com
part            /vicepa
status          OK
backupID        0
parentID        536870915
cloneID         536870916
inUse           Y
needsSalvaged   N
destroyMe       N
type            RW
creationDate    1242930289      Thu May 21 14:24:49 2009
accessDate      0               Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969
updateDate      1269892897      Mon Mar 29 16:01:37 2010
backupDate      0               Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969
copyDate        1242930289      Thu May 21 14:24:49 2009
flags           0       (Optional)
diskused        43
maxquota        5000
minquota        0       (Optional)
filecount       38
dayUse          0
weekUse         0       (Optional)
spare2          0       (Optional)
spare3          0       (Optional)

root.cell
    RWrite: 536870915     ROnly: 536870916
    number of sites -> 4
       server bethlehem.your-file-system.com partition /vicepa RW Site
       server bethlehem.your-file-system.com partition /vicepa RO Site
       server faultline.your-file-system.com partition /vicepa RO Site
       server cpe-24-193-47-88.nyc.res.rr.com partition /vicepa RO Site
    RWrite: 536870915     ROnly: 536870916
    number of sites -> 4
       server bethlehem.your-file-system.com partition /vicepa RW Site
       server bethlehem.your-file-system.com partition /vicepa RO Site
       server faultline.your-file-system.com partition /vicepa RO Site
       server cpe-24-193-47-88.nyc.res.rr.com partition /vicepa RO Site

which re-uses a similar logic for the per volume output as the
non-format.  I do notice a bug in the above output in that it lists the
same block twice.

Jeffrey Altman

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to