Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS IPv6 and NAT64 Date: Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 07:27:29AM +0200 Quoting Georg Sluyterman (ge...@sman.dk): > On 2014-04-01, at 01:31, Andrew Deason <adea...@sinenomine.net> wrote: > > <---cut---> > > The NAT64 scheme I > > think was brought up in case we could work in that environment with > > minimal changes to OpenAFS, but as far as I can tell the answer to that > > is just "no". > > > > It sounded like you were satisfied with the answers I gave, George, but > > I'm mentioning this here in case anyone else wanted to hear an actual > > answer to the original question. And of course maybe this is clearer in > > text, and after I've had more sleep and food, and we're not scribbling > > on a little piece of paper and trying to speak loudly enough that we can > > actually hear each other :) > > Hi Andrew > > Thank you for an interesting talk about the subject and thank you all for a > great conference! > > Yes, I was satisfied with the answer. As you also mentioned, I asked the > question in case it would be a minimal change to the design. It is clearly > not, so I see no point in creating support for this (at least for now where > NAT64 is not very widespread and perhaps never will be - who knows :).
As a frequent sufferer of NAT'ed AFS access with IPv6 readily available, I'd just like to chime in here -- by all means all focus should be on doing v6 properly for AFS. The kludges can come later. -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 When I met th'POPE back in '58, I scrubbed him with a MILD SOAP or DETERGENT for 15 minutes. He seemed to enjoy it ...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
