On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 5:54 AM Patrick Williams <patr...@stwcx.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 04:41:51PM -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> > From: Hitendra Prajapati <hprajap...@mvista.com>
> >
> > Upstream-Status: Backport from 
> > https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=5485c56679d7c49b96e8fc8ca708b0b7e7c03c4b]
> > Description:
> >       CVE-2022-3358 openssl: Using a Custom Cipher with NID_undef may lead 
> > to NULL encryption.
> > Affects "openssl < 3.0.6"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hitendra Prajapati <hprajap...@mvista.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.bell...@bootlin.com>
> > (cherry picked from commit f98b2273c6f03f8f6029a7a409600ce290817e27)
> > Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <st...@sakoman.com>
>
> Instead of picking up this patch, wouldn't it make a lot more sense to
> go to 3.0.7 like we did with [1]?  Since 3.0.7 contains a HIGH severity
> CVE fix as well as the one mentioned here, it seems like we should get
> that backported to both Langdale and Kirkstone quickly.

This patchset was tested and sent out for review prior to the 3.0.7
upgrade hitting master.

Note that I have the 3.0.7 upgrade in the patches currently under test
for both langdale and kirkstone:

https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/langdale-nut
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/kirkstone-nut

If the langdale test succeeds I will include the 3.0.7 upgrade patch
in the pull request for the above series (hopefully later today)

Steve

> 1. 
> https://lore.kernel.org/openembedded-core/20221101170310.2740317-1-edtan...@google.com/
>
> --
> Patrick Williams
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#172643): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/172643
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/94726924/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to