-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 14-01-10 14:48, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Koen Kooi wrote: >> NAK, the needless SPLASH -> BOOTSPLASH will create too much work for >> people to catch up to, and it messes up the docs on the subject. > > With respect to "needless", the reasons for the change were given in > this thread. Please revisit the discussion.
Phil only said short names might clash, which I don't think 'SPLASH' will ever do. > And in any case, the tremendous (LOL) amount of work can be > significantly reduced with the help of sed, as I'm sure you are aware. You are assuming I have write access to everywhere and know about every overlay in existence. > With regard to docs: > > $ rgrep SPLASH docs/ > $ > > The wiki has nothing on it, either. Nothing but hot air? No, internal docs > This has become a non-core change, image.bbclass is considered 'core' or has that changed lately? > I don't feel bound by your NAK. If you don't feel bound by NAKs you shouldn't be sending patches for review, one NAK is enough for it to get rejected. > That > being said, I know of your tendency of "my way or the highway" and have > prepared a new patch that omits the name change but is otherwise > identical. Since this addresses your "concerns" I await your ACK. The patch below looks good to me: Acked-by: Koen Kooi <[email protected]> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLTyWjMkyGM64RGpERAiiiAJ4joUTu0ZqcGvukFTFSNsrmYk13OACgmhSj BudTZxUtiG8ImtjfZ0HUOwA= =Ix9Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
