On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Jan Paesmans <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/04/2010 09:38 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On (02/06/10 22:41), Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 02-06-10 22:34, Khem Raj wrote: >> >>>> * Get rid of old style staging. >> >>>> >> >>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> >> >>>> --- >> >>>> recipes/db/db-native_4.2.52.bb | 1 - >> >>>> recipes/db/db-native_5.0.21.bb | 2 + >> >> Can these get converted to BBCLASSEXTEND? >> >> >> >> Yes. I have intended to do that afterwards >> >> > Then >> >> > Acked-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> regards, >> >> Koen > Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but libpam_1.1.0.bb doesn't like > this new berkley db. > Got compile errors on module/pam_userdb.c, anything related to dbm_... > functions that return and assign a value. As far as I can tell from the > source of db.h there is a define missing: HAVE_DBM. Adding this to the > compile line: -DHAVE_DBM=1 makes it compile fine but I haven't found > where to set it from the configure flags and if indeed this is the > correct thing to do. > For now, might I suggest a DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" to be added to > db_5.0.21.bb.
I have hit into this problem I am in process of patching pam. > > Regards, > > Jan > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
