> Tom Rini wrote: > > Sean_Hudson at Dell.com wrote: > >> On 18-06-10 21:58, Koen Kooi <k.kooi at student.utwente.nl> wrote: > >> ------------------------------ > >>> On 18-06-10 21:58, Sean_Hudson at Dell.com wrote: > >>>> Hi All, > >>>> > >>>> We are using waf for some of our modules and decided to add a > >>>> class to make it easier to write recipes. > >>> Why is there still a staging method in there? Those have been deprecated > >>> for months now. > >> > >> Thanks for taking the time to reply. To answer your question, the waf > >> class was cloned from the autotools.bbclass, so the staging stuff came > >> from there. Is there a better way to handle the staging? > >> > >> It's a fairly trivial class, but I'm interested to hear if anyone had > >> any additional thoughts on ways to improve the class? > > > > Koen's point is that for a long time now do_stage has been set as legacy > > and 'do_install' should instead set things up such that a package can > > then be installed into the sysroots/ directory and reused. Like > > autotools.bbclass does today :) > > And to be more clear, see is_legacy_staging in staging.bbclass
Thanks for clearing that up. I've attached an updated version that drops the staging function.
waf.bbclass
Description: waf.bbclass
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
