On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 09:29 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 01:24 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> -THUMB_INTERWORK = "yes" >> >> +# armv4 does not have thumb instruction set therefore no interworking >> >> instructions >> >> +# so if machine is based on armv4 we dont have choice. >> >> + >> >> +THUMB_INTERWORK_armv4 = "no" >> >> +THUMB_INTERWORK ?= "yes" >> > >> > I don't think this is necessary or desirable. If you are building for >> > v4 then the BX instructions ought to be fixed up during final link. >> >> Yes with --fix-v4bx/--fix-v4bx-interworking its possible. >> >> >> Is >> > there a particular problem that you're trying to solve? >> > >> >> Not any particular case but some versions of compiler do not pass >> flags to --fix-v4bx-interworking ld. > > True. But this is sane-toolchain we're talking about, and the version > that it selects by default (4.4.4) does get this right. So I don't > think it's going to be a big deal in practice.
yes disregard that hunk. > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
