On 01/12/2010 11:58, Petr Štetiar wrote: > Bernhard Guillon <[email protected]> [2010-12-01 12:41:31]: > >> This is true. We could add some python foo and check for angstrom? In my >> opinion the log2f patch is of no real harm. The tls support might be a >> problem. > Why to not move to some newer version of uClibc directly, without that patch > at all? > because Angstrom 2008.1 is an already released distro. We don't like switching toolchains at last minute.
Graeme _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
