On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > 2008/12/30 Jon Stanley <jonstan...@gmail.com>: >> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 3:47 PM, <fontfree...@aol.com> wrote: >> >>> "The output from running a covered work is covered by this License only if >>> the output, given its >>> content, constitutes a covered work." >> >> Since you are embedding a font, which is itself a covered work, >> unmodified into the document, an exception is required. The end. > > +1
A theoretical dissenting view: The document is not software and is not a derivative of the font. Including the font with the document, which can be used without it, is mere aggregation. - Rob.
