>One of the terms was the Fonts/Typefaces distinction. > >Nicolas felt that the current v2 site uses the term "typefaces" too >much (I hope you can explain here why) and I feel that since people >who make new fonts/typefaces talk about themselves as typeface >designers and talk about typefaces, we should "speak their language" >as much as possible; and that the distinction between the two is quite >a fine detail and its okay to refer to each as the other when not >talking precisely. I suppose I must disagree due to the vast difference between a typeface and a font in terms of the U.S. law. Typefaces are public domain functional objects, while fonts are copyrighted software. FF **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221322936x1201367173/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd =Mayfooter51209NO115)