On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:39:32 +0100, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > Where? :)
+1 :) It was late and then I start to sound absolute :); so let me nuance: I don’t think UFO is what you *should* use; it’s what I would probably use for a project, and I am biased towards it because I have used it before and because the format has been developed by colleagues from my school. (It does support opentype features, btw.) Regardless which route you go, I think what’s most important is to document our collaboration workflows and see where they can be improved; so that also smaller projects can profit from the knowledge gained. Robust collaboration should be accessible