Oh i see what you are saying now :) Yes of course. But the OFL prevents that particular freedom. I've never understood the rationale of that aspect of the OFL. Are you suggesting that restriction be removed from the OFL?
-vern On 22 May 2013, at 17:15, Barry Schwartz <chemoelect...@chemoelectric.org> wrote: > Free software can be charged for; otherwise it is not free as in > freedom. Once you pay for it, if it is copylefted, _then_ you can > redistribute, etc. > > So that’s not really a ‘situation’ unless they try to prevent the > second part.
