Sure, i think we are nearly already there. When i say ‘webfont server’ i just mean anything (e.g. just a bit of php) that allows a user in one part of the word to create a webpage that pulls a font from another part of the world, without the need for too much css coding. I don’t see any reason why the activity of ‘serving’ fonts should be centred just with ‘professionals’, every rented web space could have it’s own fontserver running, just like every webspace nowadays has it own sql server etc running.
-v On 29 Oct 2013, at 14:58, Garrick van Buren <garr...@kernest.com> wrote: > Vernon, > > I think we're already there. Modern web servers do a great job of serving > font files just as they do a great job of serving image files, javascript > files, html files, and css files. From my perspective, treating one kind of > web-delivered asset differently than others introduces an unnecessary level > of complexity across the entire design/development/deployment process. This > is why I see libre fonts as the only opportunity for sustained growth and > innovation for typography. Everything else restricts in too many unintended > ways. > > ----------------------- > Garrick van Buren > http://garrickvanburen.com > 612 325 9110 > ----------------------- > > > > > > On Oct 29, 2013, at 4:25 PM, vernon adams wrote: > >> I think you are right. >> Imo the web would be much more robust and fertile if type was even more >> ‘democratised’ and ‘autonomous’. The big web companies would be much better >> served by a few big font servers amid swarms of small font servers. >> Repeating myself, i know, :) but if webfont servers could be as commonplace >> and as easy to use as all those zillions of Wordpress installations across >> the web… it would be awesome. >> >> -v >> >> >> On 29 Oct 2013, at 12:23, Garrick van Buren <garr...@kernest.com> wrote: >> >>> On Oct 29, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: >>>> >>>> This is why Google Fonts is better than self hosting. Its likely >>>> you've already cached the most popular Google Fonts. >>> >>> >>> Sure, that's the argument for linking to any of Google-hosted resources >>> (jQuery, etc). >>> >>> Personally, I feel this approach make the web more fragile, masks the >>> approachability of HTML/CSS, and introduces privacy concerns. >>> >> >
