Hello, [I dropped nearly all individuals from the Cc: list because various bounces reported to be unhappy about the long (logical) line.]
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 03:03:54PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Looks good - just one minor change for the mctp-i2c driver, but only
> worthwhile if you end up re-rolling this series for other reasons:
>
> > -static int mctp_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > +static void mctp_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > {
> > struct mctp_i2c_client *mcli = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > struct mctp_i2c_dev *midev = NULL, *tmp = NULL;
> > @@ -1000,7 +1000,6 @@ static int mctp_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > mctp_i2c_free_client(mcli);
> > mutex_unlock(&driver_clients_lock);
> > /* Callers ignore return code */
> > - return 0;
> > }
>
> The comment there no longer makes much sense, I'd suggest removing that
> too.
Yeah, that was already pointed out to me in a private reply. It's
already fixed in
https://git.pengutronix.de/cgit/ukl/linux/log/?h=i2c-remove-void
> Either way:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Kerr <[email protected]>
Added to my tree, too.
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
