2022-06-28 at 16:03, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > From: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]> > > The value returned by an i2c driver's remove function is mostly ignored. > (Only an error message is printed if the value is non-zero that the > error is ignored.) > > So change the prototype of the remove function to return no value. This > way driver authors are not tempted to assume that passing an error to > the upper layer is a good idea. All drivers are adapted accordingly. > There is no intended change of behaviour, all callbacks were prepared to > return 0 before. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
For drivers I'm involved in, namely: > drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-ltc4306.c | 4 +--- > drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c | 3 +-- > drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 3 +-- > sound/soc/codecs/max9860.c | 3 +-- Acked-by: Peter Rosin <[email protected]> Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ Openipmi-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer
