On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 17:10 +0800, Zhao, Yakui wrote:
> From: Zhao Yakui <[email protected]>
> 
> The IPMI smi_watcher will be used to catch the IPMI interface as they come or 
> go.
> In order to communicate with the correct IPMI device, it should be confirmed
>  whether it is what we wanted especially on the system with multiple IPMI
> devices. But the new_smi callback function of smi_watcher provides very
> limited info(only the interface number and dev pointer) and there is no
> detailed info about the low level interface. For example: which mechansim
> registers the IPMI interface(ACPI, PCI, DMI and so on).
> 
> This is to add one interface that can get more info of low-level IPMI
> device. For example: the ACPI device handle will be returned for the pnp_acpi
> IPMI device.

Hi, Corey
    Does this patch set make sense?
    In this patch set the reference pointer is returned instead of
memory copy.

Thanks.
    Yakui
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <[email protected]>
> ---
> In this patch only the info of pnp_acpi IPMI is provided. If the detailed info
> is also required for other mechanism, please add them in the structure of
> ipmi_smi_info.
> 
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c    |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  include/linux/ipmi.h                |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/ipmi_smi.h            |   11 +++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c 
> b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> index 4f3f8c9..6f4da59 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
> @@ -970,6 +970,32 @@ out_kfree:
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipmi_create_user);
>  
> +int ipmi_get_smi_info(int if_num, enum ipmi_addr_src type,
> +                     struct ipmi_smi_info **data)
> +{
> +     int           rv = 0;
> +     ipmi_smi_t    intf;
> +     struct ipmi_smi_handlers *handlers;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&ipmi_interfaces_mutex);
> +     list_for_each_entry_rcu(intf, &ipmi_interfaces, link) {
> +             if (intf->intf_num == if_num)
> +                     goto found;
> +     }
> +     /* Not found, return an error */
> +     rv = -EINVAL;
> +     mutex_unlock(&ipmi_interfaces_mutex);
> +     return rv;
> +
> +found:
> +     handlers = intf->handlers;
> +     rv = handlers->get_smi_info(intf->send_info, type, data);
> +     mutex_unlock(&ipmi_interfaces_mutex);
> +
> +     return rv;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipmi_get_smi_info);
> +
>  static void free_user(struct kref *ref)
>  {
>       ipmi_user_t user = container_of(ref, struct ipmi_user, refcount);
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c 
> b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> index 7bd7c45..73b1c82 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
>  #include <asm/irq.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/ipmi.h>
>  #include <linux/ipmi_smi.h>
>  #include <asm/io.h>
>  #include "ipmi_si_sm.h"
> @@ -107,10 +108,6 @@ enum si_type {
>  };
>  static char *si_to_str[] = { "kcs", "smic", "bt" };
>  
> -enum ipmi_addr_src {
> -     SI_INVALID = 0, SI_HOTMOD, SI_HARDCODED, SI_SPMI, SI_ACPI, SI_SMBIOS,
> -     SI_PCI, SI_DEVICETREE, SI_DEFAULT
> -};
>  static char *ipmi_addr_src_to_str[] = { NULL, "hotmod", "hardcoded", "SPMI",
>                                       "ACPI", "SMBIOS", "PCI",
>                                       "device-tree", "default" };
> @@ -291,6 +288,7 @@ struct smi_info {
>       struct task_struct *thread;
>  
>       struct list_head link;
> +     struct ipmi_smi_info smi_data;
>  };
>  
>  #define smi_inc_stat(smi, stat) \
> @@ -1186,6 +1184,22 @@ static int smi_start_processing(void       *send_info,
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int get_smi_info(void *send_info,
> +                     enum ipmi_addr_src type,
> +                     struct ipmi_smi_info **data)
> +{
> +     struct smi_info *new_smi = send_info;
> +     struct ipmi_smi_info *smi_data = &new_smi->smi_data;
> +
> +     if (new_smi->addr_source != type)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     smi_data->addr_src = type;
> +
> +     *data = smi_data;
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void set_maintenance_mode(void *send_info, int enable)
>  {
>       struct smi_info   *smi_info = send_info;
> @@ -1197,6 +1211,7 @@ static void set_maintenance_mode(void *send_info, int 
> enable)
>  static struct ipmi_smi_handlers handlers = {
>       .owner                  = THIS_MODULE,
>       .start_processing       = smi_start_processing,
> +     .get_smi_info           = get_smi_info,
>       .sender                 = sender,
>       .request_events         = request_events,
>       .set_maintenance_mode   = set_maintenance_mode,
> @@ -2143,6 +2158,8 @@ static int __devinit ipmi_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev *dev,
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
>       info->addr_source = SI_ACPI;
> +     info->smi_data.smi_info.acpi_info.acpi_handle =
> +                             acpi_dev->handle;
>       printk(KERN_INFO PFX "probing via ACPI\n");
>  
>       handle = acpi_dev->handle;
> @@ -3092,6 +3109,7 @@ static int try_smi_init(struct smi_info *new_smi)
>  {
>       int rv = 0;
>       int i;
> +     struct ipmi_smi_info *smi_data = &new_smi->smi_data;
>  
>       printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Trying %s-specified %s state"
>              " machine at %s address 0x%lx, slave address 0x%x,"
> @@ -3217,6 +3235,8 @@ static int try_smi_init(struct smi_info *new_smi)
>               new_smi->dev_registered = 1;
>       }
>  
> +     smi_data->dev = new_smi->dev;
> +
>       rv = ipmi_register_smi(&handlers,
>                              new_smi,
>                              &new_smi->device_id,
> diff --git a/include/linux/ipmi.h b/include/linux/ipmi.h
> index 65aae34..1ce428f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ipmi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ipmi.h
> @@ -454,6 +454,29 @@ unsigned int ipmi_addr_length(int addr_type);
>  /* Validate that the given IPMI address is valid. */
>  int ipmi_validate_addr(struct ipmi_addr *addr, int len);
>  
> +enum ipmi_addr_src {
> +     SI_INVALID = 0, SI_HOTMOD, SI_HARDCODED, SI_SPMI, SI_ACPI, SI_SMBIOS,
> +     SI_PCI, SI_DEVICETREE, SI_DEFAULT
> +};
> +struct ipmi_smi_info{
> +     enum ipmi_addr_src addr_src;
> +     struct device *dev;
> +     union {
> +             /*
> +              * Now only SI_ACPI info is provided. If the info is required
> +              * for other type, please add it
> +              */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +             struct {
> +                     void *acpi_handle;
> +             } acpi_info;
> +#endif
> +     } smi_info;
> +};
> +
> +/* This is to get the private info of ipmi_smi_t. The pointer is returned */
> +extern int ipmi_get_smi_info(int if_num, enum ipmi_addr_src type,
> +             struct ipmi_smi_info **data);
>  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>  
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/ipmi_smi.h b/include/linux/ipmi_smi.h
> index 4b48318..bfa8f40 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ipmi_smi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ipmi_smi.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,17 @@ struct ipmi_smi_handlers {
>       int (*start_processing)(void       *send_info,
>                               ipmi_smi_t new_intf);
>  
> +     /*
> +      * Get the detailed private info of the low level interface and return
> +      * the corresponding pointer.
> +      * For example: the ACPI device handle will be returned for the
> +      * pnp_acpi IPMI device. Of course it will firstly compare the
> +      * interface type of low-level interface(Hardcoded type, DMI,
> +      * ACPI and so on). If the type doesn't match, it will return -EINVAL.
> +      */
> +     int (*get_smi_info)(void *send_info, enum ipmi_addr_src type,
> +                             struct ipmi_smi_info **data);
> +
>       /* Called to enqueue an SMI message to be sent.  This
>          operation is not allowed to fail.  If an error occurs, it
>          should report back the error in a received message.  It may


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in  U.S. and Canada
$10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing
Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Openipmi-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openipmi-developer

Reply via email to