IIRC I had filed a bugzilla a while ago at Eclipse on a javadoc Problem like
that
Tom
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 18.02.2020 um 20:09 schrieb Nir Lisker <nlis...@openjdk.java.net>:
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:15:30 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>
>>> The pull request has been updated with 2 additional commits.
>>
>> modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/javafx/collections/ListChangeListener.java
>> line 234:
>>
>>> 233: *
>>> 234: * <pre><code> for (Node n : change.getAddedSubList()) {
>>> 235: * // do something
>>
>> What is the problem with the existing example? It already matches our
>> preferred pattern for example code:
>>
>> * <pre>{@code
>> * sample code
>> * goes here
>> * }</pre>
>
> Oh, in Eclipse that was not rendered correctly, probably because of the
> interaction between `<pre>` and `{@code}`. Do you want me to revert?
>
> -------------
>
> PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/110
