Howard Chu writes: >> Though actually I would like an option for more LDIF error checking >> too: Adding whatever check ldapadd does which is convenient to add to >> slapadd, including a "verify" function in overlays like "unique", to >> be called for each entry after the database is built and indexed. > > Then I think you should just use ldapadd in the first place.
Well... To get the same speed that would mean to run a separate slapd without logs and without consistency checks. Can DB_CONFIG be used to configure slapd database operations to be more or less as fast as slapadd -q? Does slapadd still offer a speedup by adding entries first and indexing the database later? ldapadd can't do that. Will ldapadd fail as reliably as slapadd if a database error happens? -- Hallvard