On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:59:02PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > ger...@openocd.zylin.com wrote: > > Author: Paul Fertser <fercer...@gmail.com> > > Date: Thu May 17 23:38:25 2012 +0400 > > > > rtos: support FreeRTOS over stlink > > > > Since stlink is a special case it presents the same CPU core under a > > different name, so copy the configuration to account for that. > > Why and how is stlink a special case? That smells like an ugly hack.
Indeed it is. One even needs to use a bunch of specifically-crafted target configs for this interface (see target/stm32f1x.cfg vs. target/stm32f1x_stlink.cfg) and that's the way it is currently. I do not have a clue about the bigger picture so i'd be happy to see the proper solution (to the particular little issue i faced) of course. PS: it seems that the mailing list inserted a bogus "Mail-Followup-To: openocd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" header to your mail making my "Group reply" function not work properly, is this a known issue? -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:fercer...@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
