Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Xiaofan Chen <xiaof...@gmail.com> wrote:
But are you sure to have the correct libusb version. On linux and mac, the
libusb is the kernel driver for the d2xx.
This has been discussed before and I think in this case an exception should
be granted and the patch should be accepted.

Thread:
http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2011-March/018422.html

I was suggesting the user to use the open source libftdi and libftdi-1.0
under Linux instead but D2XX might still have some benefits so that
users may still want to use it.


It is a long thread but I was able to reproduce the error.
http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2011-March/018434.html
"I think the latest d2xx library needs some fix from the OpenOCD
side or from the d2xx side."

It is more difficult to ask FTDI for a fix so it may better to fix this from
OpenOCD side. Therefore I think the patch should be accepted.

When FTDI fixes D2xx, then probably the patch can be reverted.



Yes, right.

I revert my objection.

We can merge this patch and we will revert it lately.

Regards,
Laurent
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to