Ariel Monaco wrote: >> BW> Note if you are worried about this you arlso need to be careful >> BW> about checking to see if a domain name is available. If you check >> (...) >> >> /Benny >> > > Benny is right, proposed name should also need to be available. Also, about > the most voted name, > it may be my interpretation, but the name CallWeaver sucks. Sounds like a > proprietary brand. > Fair comment. > We need a name, but we're developers, engineers. Ask your wives, your > children. Branding (even in > terms of an Open Source organization, in order to receive donations, etc.) > is a very important part > of the project's development. > Sure is. Its also important to get a name that sticks this time.
It seems you forgot to include your brilliant alternative suggestion. Maybe that makes your's a far less fair comment. :-) Steve _______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
