On Tue, Jan 14, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003, Bill Campbell wrote: >> I understand that. My suggestion pertained more to the documentation than >> the implementation on the grounds that the names are familiar to Unix >> admins and developers. > > Yes, you're right, the documentation for these issues is still very > bad. There is just a small and confusing paragraph about this in the > handbook. > Now there's a big and confusing paragraph in the handbook ;-)
http://www.openpkg.org/doc/handbook/openpkg.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Development Team, Application Services Cable & Wireless Deutschland GmbH
msg03691/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
