Hello Andreas,
Andreas Halm wrote:
> A Node-derived class created via fcd contains this code
>
> virtual FieldContainer *createAspectCopy(FieldContainer *pRefAspect) const;
>
> while its base class contains
>
> virtual Node *createAspectCopy(const FieldContainer *pRefAspect) const;
>
> whats the deal?
Node is not generated from an .fcd, but hand written, so accidentally
covariant return types were used there and not in the generated code.
I changed Node to also return just a FieldContainer*, r2302.
> Version is r2279. Is it a bug or is it forbidden/unusual to
> derive from Node?
I'm not aware of anyone deriving from Node before, there may be code
that assumes nothing derives from Node, although off the top of my head
I could not point at anything in particular.
> In my case it seems to make sense as the functionality I
> am implementing depends only on the bounding volume and there is no data to
> sync - only the attached NodeCore (which would be a Transform NodeCore)
> would be synched.
hm, maybe. What do you want to do? ;)
Cheers,
Carsten
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
