John Zolnowsky x69422/408-404-5064 writes: > Is there any requirement that the build retain the CDDL block for > configuration files? Just like compilation loses the copyright, > is there any reason that the build procedures can't sed out the CDDL > in configuration files?
That seems plausible, as the ruling I was given was that "source files" were the ones that required the giant text block. It didn't matter whether this "source" was just copied directly into the final product (that is: all stuff in the gate is "source"), and the final product did not require CDDL. So, it seems reasonable to me, but I've learned along the way that "reasonable" doesn't necessarily equate to "legal." Thus, I agree with Stephen: gather the bugs up first, and then go for a new round of review. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
