Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Note that I find a similar case in /usr/sbin/sparcv9 as well. Although,
in that case, it appears that there is less duplication, and most of the
contents of /usr/sbin with equivalents in /usr/bin/sparcv9 are just
links to isaexec. But why even waste the extra cycles to do the
isaexec, when we could just have the binaries physically in /usr/sbin?
(Likewise for isaexec binaries in /usr/bin.)
I noticed that as well a while ago and filed:
6226947 isaexec and the sparcv[79] binaries no longer useful on sparc
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
