> > So, as originally requested, I agree with (2). I suppose I could be > > persuaded > > I think Roland asked Peter Memishian for a resolution. It's up to him > to decide whether the innovative (1,3) or the traditional (2) > implementation is the right one.
It's not just up to me. Anyone is welcome to review the code and request changes. Of course, the code review requestor (Roland) is free to disagree and defend his decisions. In general, the discussion should naturally converge. -- meem _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
