陶捷 Tao Jie wrote: > I don't know, but I've succeeded to build ON b66 with SS12 and it works > well now. > But it's a debug version. And as I've mentioned in the previous email, I > fail to Install the non-debug version. > > > 2007/7/6, Boyd Adamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > "Tao Jie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> writes: > > Hi, Ali > > > > > No, you may safely ignore duplicate SUNW_dynsymsort messages. > They are > > > more about tidiness than correctness. See here if you are > interested > > > in the details: > > > > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/flag-days/pages/2007052202/ > > > I'm surprised to see those errors, as ON should be completely clean > > > following the putback described in that flag day message. One > > > possibility is that you are using a new copy of > > > usr/src/tools/script/check_rtime.pl against an older copy of the > > > libelf code. > > > > err... I don't know why it occurs :( > > > > I'm building ON b66 on the Solaris Express B66 with Sun Studio 12. > > Umm... is building with Studio 12 supported yet? > > Boyd > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
We're not building ON with Studio 12 yet, we're still on Studio 11. My nightly builds with Studio 11 came out clean with regards to SUNW_dynsymsort messages. So, I think the compiler change is likely the cause of those warnings. We'll mop up those warnings as part of the switch to the new compiler (I'm not sure where we are on that). In the meantime, you should feel free to ignore the SUNW_dynsymsort warnings --- they don't change the way the resulting code works. - Ali _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
