Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
>
> Actually, that macro mumbo-jumbo should be avoided and we should adopt
> a new name standard, but that will also require a lot of work, not
> only on our part... Perhaps to version 1?
>
Or dump the low level APIs...
> geoff> Thoughts anyone?
>
> Well, apart from going to the level of a 3 years old and cry "We were
> there first!" (or at least, SSLeay...), no. Then again, I can't be
> completely sure that's true as well...
>
Nor am I. This issue has been mentioned before and has been around at
least as long as NSS has. It may well crop up more now the NSS code is
publically available.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior crypto engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Core developer of the OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/
Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: via homepage.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
